April 23, 2004

Turning Rebellion Into Money

Posted by nerdling | April 23, 2004 10:22 AM

I was excited about the upcoming presidential election for approximately two weeks. Those weeks were during the Democratic primaries, back when I thought someone with some substance—some real ideas, maybe—had a snowball's chance in Hell of being nominated. I was, quite obviously, wrong.

Before reading the quotation below, taken from a article about the GOP losing votes by alienating young voters and mocking the Democrats for trying to engage members of the hip-hop community, I'd like to mention my thoughts on the matter. Shocking even myself, for once I agree (in tone, if not in principle) with the Republican objection to Kerry's appearance on MTV. The excerpt below is horrifyingly patronizing. It isn't even creative condescension—he doesn't say anything at all, and he expects the youth voters to eat it up because he has something that sounds sort of nice to say about the music they listen to! Well, fuck you John Kerry. Fuck you and your trite party line about the poetry and violence of rap. Keep that up and I might vote for Nader just to spite you and the handlers that let you loose on the world with that bullshit.

On March 30, Sen. John Kerry appeared on an MTV news special for an interview, where he was asked about trends in popular music. "I'm fascinated by rap and by hip-hop," Kerry responded. "I think there's a lot of poetry in it. There's a lot of anger, a lot of social energy in it. And I think you'd better listen to it pretty carefully, because it's important."

It's important all right—if the kids who listen to rap don't vote for you, you're screwed. Aside from Kerry's repugnant little episode, I was terribly disappointed by Salon's coverage of the story, ironically explaining to the reader that the GOP pundits who are lambasting Kerry would "be tagged as playa hatas" in the rap community. Oh Salon, you smug, pretentious bunch of terrifyingly liberal idiots! What would your readership do if didn't have you to explain the intricacies of urban culture?

Comments

Yes, but you're missing something very important. Something that we cannot fail to overlook:

At least we can be confident that, while giving that quote, Kerry pronounced all the words correctly.

Posted by: Jim at April 25, 2004 03:55 PM

An excellent point, and well taken.

While it warms my heart that Kerry adheres to the standard rules of English grammar, it does little to soothe my ruffled feathers, because it should not be an issue at all. If you're running for President you should be able to pronouce 'nuclear' correctly, period.

Why the hell else does the President have speech writers and hordes of assistants, if not to keep him from fucking up something as simple as a common three-syllable word in his native language?

Posted by: Marleigh at April 26, 2004 03:09 PM

I like the angry Marleigh. Let's see more of this!

I disagree with you, though. Of course John Kerry is courting the youth vote, and of course he's going to patronize them. Just like he patronizes the old people, the blacks, the Jews, the blue-collar workers, and the Hispanics when he's talking to those demographics. He's a politician--patronizing is his job.

Which is why I'm not very excited about John Kerry, although I plan to vote for him.

But, really, what's so wrong with what he said about hip-hop? To me, it seems like a fair statement coming from a culturally out-of-touch middle-aged white man. I've certainly never heard my Dad say anything as close to an endorsement for hip-hop. What other white politicians, particularly candidates for an office as important as President, are even mentioning hip-hop, much less saying it's "important"?

So give Kerry a break, huh? At least on this one.

Posted by: scotty at April 28, 2004 11:25 AM

It annoys me because of the very fact that it has nothing to do with him; he's very obviously not in touch with hip hop culture and that's fine. He is a middle-aged, wealthy white guy. Middle-aged white guys generally don't have much interest in hip hop unless they are financing it as record company execs. I'm okay with this.

What I'm not okay with is the constant stream of patronizing behaviour. Yes, that is what politicians do but I am sincerely offended by the fact that they think I (and everyone else near my age) is stupid enough to be won over—and God forbid, grateful—that a bunch of bloated, self-obsessed old men are paying any attention to us at all outside of constantly trying to sell us Diesel jeans and some perverted, conformist version of youthful rebellion.

It pisses me off because even when someone is trying to win my vote by telling me I'm smart and someone in power cares what I think, they're still telling me I'm too stupid to know better.

Posted by: Marleigh at April 29, 2004 10:42 AM

I disagree -- they're not trying to win your vote. Not at all. In fact, they are pretty sure your vote is securely in their camp solely by the fact that you and the demographic you represent really fucking hate Bush.

They're trying to go after the dumb people. Sadly, dumb people will be the swing in this election. Dumb people who are not rich or well-educated and have no idea that all of the current White House policy is very much against them. They're the ones Kerry is pandering to, and they're the ones who might be swayed by Kerry complimenting hip-hop.

Smart people like us know that commercial hip-hop has been stagnant for ten years now, ever since Dr. Dre made his first million. We also know Kerry is our only chance of getting Bush out of the White House. There's simply no need to campaign for our vote -- it's already there.

Posted by: Jim at April 30, 2004 11:48 AM

Unfortunately you're right about not having any choices, but Kerry does have to campaign for our votes because people our age are the very demographic that don't vote.

The Democrats have one big fear at this point: voters over 35. Those are the people with salaries and houses and two SUVs and kids and dogs. Those are the people who vote for Bush because they think (statistically speaking, from poll results) that Bush is still a more hard-line leader and thusly, can better lead a country facing the constant threat of terrorism.

I think these people are ignorant with very few critical thinking skills and barely veiled xenophobic tendencies, but what I think doesn't change the world. If it did, we wouldn't even be debating this.

Posted by: Marleigh at April 30, 2004 02:15 PM